priors.science/reviews/magnesium

Magnesium

The current evidence on 8 claims, ordered from most established to most contested. Each score is the panel’s evidence certainty — how firmly the literature supports the claim as stated.

8claims tracked
98primary papers reviewed
9 Aug 2026latest evidence review
Weeklyre-scored against new papers
0 Established · 1 Likely · 2 Uncertain · 5 Doubtful  |  four-reviewer panel · PICO Framework
ClaimStandingEvidence certaintyCorpus
Magnesium lowers blood pressureCardiovascularLong-standingLikely70%18
Magnesium improves glycaemic controlMetabolicUncertain64%13
Magnesium for migraineNeurologicalUncertain58%12
Magnesium intake and diabetes riskMetabolicDoubtful47%13
Magnesium and bone densityMusculoskeletalDoubtful46%12
Magnesium for sleepNeurologicalEarly evidenceDoubtful43%13
Magnesium intake and strokeCardiovascularDoubtful42%12
Magnesium for leg crampsMusculoskeletalDoubtful30%13
Track Magnesium.
These claims are re-scored against new papers every week. Track this topic for the full review, including each claim’s challenge and the papers behind it.
Track this topic →
Standing — what the evidence certainty means
Established≥ 85%Strong, consistent evidence. Unlikely to change.
Likely70–84%Well supported, with some gaps or indirect evidence.
Uncertain50–69%Mixed or limited evidence. Genuinely open.
Doubtful30–49%Little support; the weight of evidence leans against it.
Refuted< 30%The evidence contradicts it — confidently false as stated.
Where the evidence sits in time
Early evidenceMost of this evidence is from the last two years.
Long-standingMost of this evidence is older than the rest of this field.